Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-24Q
Radeon R9 270X
Popular choices:
RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTXA5000-24Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The RTXA5000-24Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 270X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 270X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-24Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $2,100 for the RTXA5000-24Q, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5227.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5227.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270X and RTXA5000-24Q
Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.
RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874+1% | 4,803 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 8192+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.688 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+933% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1695 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 8 MB+2481% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 109mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1+30% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 and now averages $2100. The Radeon R9 270X costs 98.1% less ($2060 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 5195.7% better value. The RTXA5000-24Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-95% | $3721 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-98% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.8+5196% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Curacao | GA102 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #448 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 270X and RTXA5000-24Q
