
Radeon R9 270X

RTXA5000-24Q
Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-24Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-24Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,522 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1797.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTXA5000-24Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1769.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-24Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874+1% | 4,803 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 8192+540% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.688 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+933% |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1695 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 8 MB+2481% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTXA5000-24Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-24Q carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-24Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 109mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1+30% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 270X came in at $199, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270X was 94.7% cheaper ($3522 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 1784.6% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-24Q (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-95% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5+1785% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Curacao | GA102 |
| Release | October 8 2013 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #448 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














