Radeon R9 270X vs RTXA5000-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-8Q

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

99%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

98%

#280

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7499%

#295

RTXA5000-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

100%

#297

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

99%

#299

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

98%

#300

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

98%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

96%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

92%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

89%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

88%

#306

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

88%

#308

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

87%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

86%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RTXA5000-8Q is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The RTXA5000-8Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 270X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTXA5000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 270X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $2,500 for the RTXA5000-8Q, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 6096.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+6096.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 270X Benchmark Check

RTXA5000-8Q Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270X and RTXA5000-8Q

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

RTXA5000-8Q

The RTXA5000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,916 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the RTXA5000-8Q reaches 4,916 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RTXA5000-8Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-8Q). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-8Q). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
G3D Mark Score	4,874	4,916
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280	8192+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.688 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+933%
Boost Clock	1050 MHz	1695 MHz+61%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	8 MB+2481%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTXA5000-8Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-8Q) — the RTXA5000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the RTXA5000-8Q's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (RTXA5000-8Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 270X	RTXA5000-8Q
TDP	180W-22%	230W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	109mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80 C	—
Perf/Watt	27.1+27%	21.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RTXA5000-8Q launched at $2500 and now averages $2500. The Radeon R9 270X costs 98.4% less ($2460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 2.0 (RTXA5000-8Q) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 5990% better value. The RTXA5000-8Q is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).