Radeon R9 270X
VS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

2013Boost: 1050 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

2020Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 2105 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
169%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
166%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
164%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
159%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
158%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
158%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
152%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
141%
#69
Radeon RX 6800 XT
MSRP: $649|Avg: $743
139%
#70
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
MSRP: $999|Avg: $930
139%
#71
Radeon RX 6950 XT
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $850
136%
#72
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $550
132%
#73
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $500
125%
#74
GeForce RTX 5080
MSRP: $999|Avg: $1250
118%
#75
GeForce RTX 3090
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $900
104%
#76
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#77
GeForce RTX 4090
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649
95%
#78
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100
87%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
60%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
59%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
57%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
51%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
50%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
41%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
39%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
38%
#87
Radeon RX 7500
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
34%
#88
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
33%
#89
Moore Threads MTT S70
MSRP: $345|Avg: $140
32%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
31%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
31%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 270X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H.

InsightRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 402.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+402.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270X and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD

Radeon R9 270X

The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H reaches 4,852 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2105 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
G3D Mark Score
4,874
4,852
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1280
3840+200%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.688 TFLOPS
16.17 TFLOPS+502%
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2105 MHz+100%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
80
240+200%
L1 Cache
320 KB
768 KB+140%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 270X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270X) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None.

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
TDP
180W-28%
250W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
241mm
Height
109mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
80 C
Perf/Watt
27.1+40%
19.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270X launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200 and now averages $200. The Radeon R9 270X costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 401.2% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 270XRadeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP
$199
$200
Avg Price (30d)
$40-80%
$200
Performance per Dollar
121.8+401%
24.3
Codename
Curacao
Navi 21
Release
October 8 2013
October 28 2020
Ranking
#448
#65