
Radeon R9 270X

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 270X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.5 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014Why buy it
- ✅16.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌126.1% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 24.5 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,874 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270X scores 4,874 and the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Raw compute: 2.688 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270X) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,874 | 5,000+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.688 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 270X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 270X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270X) vs 174 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — a 3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270X. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270X and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s+3% | 174 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270X draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon R9 270X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 109mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 27.1+36% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 270X came in at $199, while the Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270X was 55.8% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.5 (Radeon R9 270X) vs 11.1 (Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition) — the Radeon R9 270X offers 120.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270X | Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-56% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5+121% | 11.1 |
| Codename | Curacao | Amethyst |
| Release | October 8 2013 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #448 | #436 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














