
FirePro S9050

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3534.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,944 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3459.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901+2% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+24% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro S9050 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) carries 2 GB. FirePro S9050 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S9050 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 560X (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 73.8+239% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S9050 came in at $1999, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560X (móvel) was 97.2% cheaper ($1944 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 3392% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (móvel) (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $55-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 87.3+3392% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #446 | #483 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














