
FirePro S9050
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S9050
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌3534.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,944 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3459.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S9050: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
FirePro S9050
2014Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,944 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3459.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S9050: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌3534.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S9050 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than FirePro S9050?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 4 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050
The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,901+2% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+75% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+24% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+75% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S9050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 254mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.8 | 73.8+239% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 97.2% less ($1944 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 3392% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro S9050 | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $55-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 87.3+3392% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 7 2014 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #446 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












