FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018Core: 1275 MHzBoost: 1202 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S9050

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 3534.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 87.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
  • 246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,944 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3459.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S9050: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S9050 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro S9050 better than Radeon RX 560X (móvel)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,901 vs 4,800 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro S9050 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro S9050 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro S9050 is about 3534.5% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon RX 560X (móvel) make more sense than FirePro S9050?
Yes. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (65W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $55 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro S9050. The trade-off is that FirePro S9050 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560X (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low104 FPS52 FPS
medium89 FPS34 FPS
high73 FPS25 FPS
ultra43 FPS15 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS37 FPS
medium80 FPS22 FPS
high58 FPS13 FPS
ultra33 FPS8 FPS
4K
low29 FPS16 FPS
medium27 FPS10 FPS
high18 FPS6 FPS
ultra16 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low140 FPS88 FPS
medium108 FPS57 FPS
high86 FPS43 FPS
ultra59 FPS25 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS42 FPS
medium56 FPS30 FPS
high42 FPS21 FPS
ultra31 FPS15 FPS
4K
low29 FPS11 FPS
medium20 FPS8 FPS
high16 FPS7 FPS
ultra12 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low221 FPS216 FPS
medium176 FPS173 FPS
high147 FPS144 FPS
ultra110 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS162 FPS
medium132 FPS130 FPS
high110 FPS108 FPS
ultra83 FPS81 FPS
4K
low110 FPS108 FPS
medium88 FPS86 FPS
high74 FPS72 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
1080p
low183 FPS183 FPS
medium148 FPS143 FPS
high130 FPS116 FPS
ultra101 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS143 FPS
medium107 FPS111 FPS
high94 FPS86 FPS
ultra69 FPS68 FPS
4K
low76 FPS77 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high47 FPS47 FPS
ultra31 FPS36 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S9050 scores 4,901 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S9050 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro S9050) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
4,901+2%
4,800
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1792+75%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+24%
2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+75%
64
L1 Cache
448 KB+75%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S9050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S9050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has 2 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S9050 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S9050) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
TDP
225W
65W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
254mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
21.8
73.8+239%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 97.2% less ($1944 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro S9050) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 3392% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S9050Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP
$1999
$55-97%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
87.3+3392%
Codename
Tahiti
Polaris 21
Release
August 7 2014
April 11 2018
Ranking
#446
#483