
Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs FirePro W9100

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Popular choices:

FirePro W9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W9100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 580 2048SP.
| Insight | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $200 for the FirePro W9100, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 228.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+228.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 580 2048SP and FirePro W9100

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1284 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,633 points.

FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 7,633 and the FirePro W9100 reaches 7,748 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W9100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 2,816 (FirePro W9100). Raw compute: 5.259 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,633 | 7,748+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2816+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.259 TFLOPS | 5.238 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 176+38% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 704 KB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 1 MB (FirePro W9100) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 12 (FirePro W9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs H.264 (FirePro W9100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP draws 150W versus the FirePro W9100's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 350W (FirePro W9100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 93.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-45% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 275mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-19% | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 50.9+80% | 28.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the FirePro W9100 launched at $4000 and now averages $200. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP costs 70% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 127.2 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) vs 38.7 (FirePro W9100) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 228.7% better value. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 2048SP | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-94% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-70% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.2+229% | 38.7 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Hawaii |
| Release | October 15 2018 | March 26 2014 |
| Ranking | #334 | #328 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















