Radeon RX 6550M vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Radeon RX 6550M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6550M is positioned at rank #61 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6550M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6550M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6550M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6550M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6550M and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Radeon RX 6550M
The Radeon RX 6550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2840 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,705 points.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6550M scores 9,705 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6550M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 5.816 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 2840 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,705 | 9,815+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1152+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.816 TFLOPS+48% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2840 MHz+66% | 1708 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 432 KB+69% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6550M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6550M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The Radeon RX 6550M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144 GB/s | 192 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon RX 6550M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6550M draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 6550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-33% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 250mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.3+48% | 81.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6550M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GP106 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | August 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #267 | #272 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6550M and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
