CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6550M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6550M is positioned at rank 61 and the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is on rank 77, so the Radeon RX 6550M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6550M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6550M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6550M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6550M and GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
Radeon RX 6550M
The Radeon RX 6550M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2840 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,705 points.
GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6550M scores 9,705 and the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design reaches 9,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6550M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.816 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 4.55 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2840 MHz vs 1185 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) vs 240.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,705 | 9,674 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.816 TFLOPS+28% | 4.55 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2840 MHz+140% | 1185 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.9 MB+660% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 30+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6550M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6550M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 264 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) — a 83.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144 GB/s | 264 GB/s+83% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6550M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon RX 6550M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6550M draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design's 65W — a 20.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6550M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6550M | GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 65W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 121.3 | 148.8+23% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6550M and GeForce RTX 2060 with Max-Q Design
