Radeon RX 6600 LE
RTX A2000
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.6% higher power demand at 132W vs 70W.
- ❌13.8% longer card at 190mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 132W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 190mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 6600 LE is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌36.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600 LE scores 13,758 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 26 (RTX A2000) vs 104.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,758+2% | 13,464 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3328+86% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.942 TFLOPS+12% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz+108% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+8% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3.3 MB+560% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+8% | 26 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6600 LE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600 LE and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600 LE draws 132W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 61.4% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 70W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 167mm |
| Height | 110mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.2 | 192.3+85% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 6600 LE came in at $329, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6600 LE was 26.9% cheaper ($121 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 41.8 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 39.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6600 LE (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600 LE | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-27% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.8+40% | 29.9 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GA106 |
| Release | December 8 2023 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #176 | #186 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6600 LE and RTX A2000
