GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX 6600 LE
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6600 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 980 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $160 for the Radeon RX 6600 LE, it costs 38% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 59.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($160) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX 6600 LE
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,758 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+57% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2495 MHz+132% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+57% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 61.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 132W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 104.2+90% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329 and now averages $160. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 37.5% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 137.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 86.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 59.4% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $329-49% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-38% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 137.1+59% | 86.0 |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #179 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX 6600 LE
