GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Radeon RX 5700
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌71.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅8.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 78.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 14,296+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+22% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 7.949 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1725 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+22% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 5700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 5700. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 79.4+45% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti came in at $649, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5700 was 41.6% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 78.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5700 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $379-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 37.7+79% |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 10 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #179 | #167 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX 5700
