
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Quadro GP100

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $1,335), it costs 93% less, resulting in a 1235.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1235.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Quadro GP100

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,710 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3584+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 10.34 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1442 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 176 | 224+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 204.8% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 384-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 4096-bit+967% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 235W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 58.3+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 and now averages $1335. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 92.5% less ($1235 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 137.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.3 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 1231.1% better value. The Quadro GP100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-91% | $7000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-93% | $1335 |
| Performance per Dollar | 137.1+1231% | 10.3 |
| Codename | GM200 | GP100 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #179 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















