GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Intel Arc Pro B60
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌29.8% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 980 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,807 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+103% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2400 MHz+123% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 176+10% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 carries 8 GB. Intel Arc Pro B60 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B60. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 82-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 69.0+26% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti came in at $649, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B60 was 23% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 30.8% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B60 (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $500-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 27.6+31% |
| Codename | GM200 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #179 | #175 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Intel Arc Pro B60
