GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Radeon RX Vega 64
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 295W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌30.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌18% higher power demand at 295W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,949+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 4096+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+109% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1546 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176 | 256+45% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 64 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 44% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 484 GB/s+44% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 2048-bit+433% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 16.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-15% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8+16% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti came in at $649, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 64 was 23.1% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 32.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 64 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $499-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 28.0+33% |
| Codename | GM200 | Vega 10 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #179 | #171 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64
