
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6600 LE

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6600 LE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro GP100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6600 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $160 versus $1,335 for the Quadro GP100, it costs 88% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 737.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+737.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($160) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and Radeon RX 6600 LE

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,758 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS+16% | 8.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2495 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro GP100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE has 8 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+357% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 56.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 132W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 104.2+79% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329 and now averages $160. The Radeon RX 6600 LE costs 88% less ($1175 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 86.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 735% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $329-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $160-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 86.0+735% |
| Codename | GP100 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #178 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















