Quadro GP100
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6600 LE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6600 LE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6600 LE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅14.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2027.7% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌78% higher power demand at 235W vs 132W.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2035.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 132W instead of 235W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6600 LE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,758 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS+16% | 8.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2495 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6600 LE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro GP100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE carries 8 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600 LE. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+357% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 56.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 132W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 104.2+79% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro GP100 came in at $7000, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6600 LE was 95.3% cheaper ($6671 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 41.8 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 1990% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6600 LE (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $329-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 41.8+1990% |
| Codename | GP100 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #178 | #176 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and Radeon RX 6600 LE
