Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Quadro GP100

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

2016Core: 1304 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Quadro GP100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Quadro GP100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Quadro GP100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1309.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 200W instead of 235W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

  • 43.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1300% HIGHER MSRP
    $7,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 17.5% higher power demand at 235W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro GP100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Intel Arc Pro B60 instead at 13,807 vs 13,710, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B60 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,500 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $7,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1309.9% (27.6 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro GP100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Quadro GP100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B60

The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score
13,807
13,710
Architecture
Xe2
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560
3584+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS+19%
10.34 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2400 MHz+66%
1442 MHz
ROPs
16
96+500%
TMUs
160
224+40%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 carries 16 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B60 and 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Bus Width
128-bit
4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
Encoder
Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)
NVENC 4th gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)
NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 16.1% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 80°C.

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
TDP
200W-15%
235W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
82
80°C-2%
Perf/Watt
69.0+18%
58.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B60 came in at $500, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B60 was 92.9% cheaper ($6500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 1280% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B60 (2025 vs 2016).

FeatureIntel Arc Pro B60Quadro GP100
MSRP
$500-93%
$7000
Performance per Dollar
27.6+1280%
2.0
Codename
BMG-G21
GP100
Release
September 5 2025
October 1 2016
Ranking
#175
#178

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.