Intel Arc Pro B60
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅50.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌69.8% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) vs 136.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 14,363+4% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4352+70% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+23% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160+18% | 136 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 34+70% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B60 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 70°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 205.2+197% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B60 came in at $500, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B60 was 41.1% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 63.3% better value.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-41% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+63% | 16.9 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GB206 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #175 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
