Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX A2000 12GB
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 12GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A2000 12GB.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A2000 12GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $450 for the Intel Arc Pro B60, it costs 16% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 17.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and RTX A2000 12GB
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 104.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+54% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+100% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 26+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 196.0+184% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449 and now averages $380. The RTX A2000 12GB costs 15.6% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 36.1 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 17.6% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $449-10% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $380-16% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.7 | 36.1+18% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA106 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #175 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and RTX A2000 12GB
