Intel Arc Pro B60
RTX A2000 12GB
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX A2000 12GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX A2000 12GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX A2000 12GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌11.4% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs RTX A2000 12GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) vs 104.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+54% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+100% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 26+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 12GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B60 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 12GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 70W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 196.0+184% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B60 came in at $500, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. On MSRP, RTX A2000 12GB was 10.2% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 10.9% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B60 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $449-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6 | 30.6+11% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GA106 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #175 | #177 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and RTX A2000 12GB
