CPU
GPU
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (249mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $450 for the Intel Arc Pro B60, it costs 51% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 109.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($219) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060+2% | 13,807 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+4% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 20+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+36% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP and currently averages $219, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 and now averages $450. The Arc B570 costs 51.3% less ($231 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Arc B570 offers 109.1% better value.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-56% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $219-51% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+109% | 30.7 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #169 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B570 and Intel Arc Pro B60
