CPU
GPU
Arc B570
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc B570.
| Insight | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (249mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $748 for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 234.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+234.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($219) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($748) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 144 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,363+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+28% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+5% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 32 MB+78% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 144+6% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B570 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 32 MB+78% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7 | 205.2+119% |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP and currently averages $219, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849 and now averages $748. The Arc B570 costs 70.7% less ($529 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 19.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Arc B570 offers 234.4% better value.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-74% | $849 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $219-71% | $748 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+234% | 19.2 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GB206 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #169 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B570 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
