Arc B570
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Arc B570 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc B570 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc B570 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 279.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌49.1% longer card at 249mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 249mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌287.7% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc B570 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 144 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,363+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+28% | 1957 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+5% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 32 MB+78% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 144+6% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc B570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Arc B570 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB | 32 MB+78% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7 | 205.2+119% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc B570 came in at $219, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, Arc B570 was 74.2% cheaper ($630 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Arc B570 offers 279.9% better value.
| Feature | Arc B570 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-74% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+280% | 16.9 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GB206 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #169 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B570 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
