Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

Intel

Arc B570

2025Core: 2500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz
Arc family
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz
Similar parts
···

Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc B570

2025

Why buy it

  • 57.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
  • 733.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 18W.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 18W instead of 150W, a 132W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Arc B570 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc B570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) instead at 14,832 vs 14,060, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc B570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2020. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc B570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc B570

The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc B570 scores 14,060 versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 14,832 — the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) leads by 5.5%. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
14,060
14,832+5%
Architecture
Xe2
Turing
Process Node
5 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+157%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.52 TFLOPS+279%
3.037 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2500 MHz+47%
1695 MHz
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
144+157%
56
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+411%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
18 MB+1700%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc B570 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc B570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc B570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Arc B570 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
160-bit
256-bit+60%
L2 Cache
18 MB+1700%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Encoder
Intel Xe Media
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
Intel Xe Media
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
TDP
150W
18W-88%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
249mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
93.7
824.0+779%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc B570 (2025 vs 2020).

FeatureArc B570Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
MSRP
$219
Codename
BMG-G21
TU117
Release
January 16 2025
December 2 2020
Ranking
#169
#548

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.