
Arc B570

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅57.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 18W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 150W, a 132W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Arc B570 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc B570 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc B570 scores 14,060 versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 14,832 — the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) leads by 5.5%. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,832+5% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+279% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+47% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+411% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+1700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc B570 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc B570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Arc B570 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+1700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 18W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7 | 824.0+779% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc B570 (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | TU117 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | December 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #169 | #548 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















