CPU
GPU
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc B570 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Arc B570 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc B570.
| Insight | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (249mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $300 for the Radeon Pro W5700, it costs 27% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 33.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($219) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Radeon Pro W5700
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,380+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+30% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+30% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 31% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-27% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+34% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP and currently averages $219, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 and now averages $300. The Arc B570 costs 27% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Arc B570 offers 34% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-73% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $219-27% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+34% | 47.9 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #169 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc B570 and Radeon Pro W5700
