CPU
GPU
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Intel Arc Pro B60 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro W5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $450 for the Intel Arc Pro B60, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 56.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+56.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Radeon Pro W5700
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 14,380+4% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+38% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+24% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 2.5% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-2% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 70.1+2% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 and now averages $300. The Radeon Pro W5700 costs 33.3% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 47.9 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 offers 56% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-37% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $300-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.7 | 47.9+56% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #175 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and Radeon Pro W5700
