Intel Arc Pro B60
Titan X Pascal
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌139.8% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807+1% | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+12% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+57% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B60 and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0+26% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel Arc Pro B60 came in at $500, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro B60 was 58.3% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 142.1% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B60 (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-58% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.6+142% | 11.4 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | GP102 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #175 | #198 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and Titan X Pascal
