Quadro GP100
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Quadro GP100 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro GP100 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro GP100 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌600% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$1,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ❌42.4% higher power demand at 235W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,000 less on MSRP ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 614.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 235W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro GP100 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,992+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2581 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT carries 12 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 128-bit on the RadeonT RX 6850M XT. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 35% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 165W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 84.8+45% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro GP100 came in at $7000, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. On MSRP, RadeonT RX 6850M XT was 85.7% cheaper ($6000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 600% better value. The newer card here is RadeonT RX 6850M XT (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $1000-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 14.0+600% |
| Codename | GP100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #178 | #103 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT
