Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100

CPU

GPU

Arc B570

2025Core: 2500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz

Arc family

Buy on Amazon

Quadro GP100

2016Core: 1304 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Similar parts

···

Buy on Amazon

Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100 Performance Spectrum

Arc B570

8 GB 150

14,060

+2.6%

13,710

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

TITAN V CEO Edition

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3080 12GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc B570

2025

Why buy it

✅8.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6,781 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3177.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
3096.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc B570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (14,060 vs 13,710), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc B570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc B570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,781 cheaper on MSRP at $219 vs $7,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3177.9% (64.2 vs 2.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc B570

The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score	14,060+3%	13,710
Architecture	Xe2	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3584+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.52 TFLOPS+11%	10.34 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2500 MHz+73%	1442 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	144	224+56%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+246%	1.3 MB
L2 Cache	18 MB+350%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc B570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 carries 16 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 169.5% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Arc B570 and 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	380 GB/s	1024 GB/s+169%
Bus Width	160-bit	4096-bit+2460%
L2 Cache	18 MB+350%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
Encoder	Intel Xe Media	NVENC 4th gen
Decoder	Intel Xe Media	NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 44.2% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
TDP	150W-36%	235W
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	249mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	93.7+61%	58.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc B570 came in at $219, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. On MSRP, Arc B570 was 96.9% cheaper ($6781 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the Arc B570 offers 3110% better value. The newer card here is Arc B570 (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
MSRP	$219-97%	$7000
Performance per Dollar	64.2+3110%	2.0
Codename	BMG-G21	GP100
Release	January 16 2025	October 1 2016
Ranking	#169	#178

Search Arc B570 on Amazon

Search Quadro GP100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.