Arc B570 vs Quadro GP100

CPU

GPU

Arc B570

2025Core: 2500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Quadro GP100

2016Core: 1304 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc B570

8 GB 150

14,060

+2.6%

13,710

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

TITAN V CEO Edition

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3080 12GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc B570

2025

Why buy it

✅8.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6,781 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3177.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3096.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.

Arc B570

2025

Quadro GP100

2016

Why buy it

✅8.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $6,781 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3177.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
3096.3% HIGHER MSRP
$7,000 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc B570 better than Quadro GP100?

Yes. Arc B570 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Arc B570 averages 8.9% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,060 vs 13,710 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc B570 is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Quadro GP100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc B570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc B570 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Arc B570 is about $6,781 cheaper on MSRP at $219 MSRP versus $7,000 MSRP, and you are getting 8.9% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 3177.9%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro GP100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro GP100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $7,000 MSRP, even if Arc B570 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc B570 Benchmark Check

Quadro GP100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	177 FPS	190 FPS
medium	161 FPS	177 FPS
high	142 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	177 FPS
medium	118 FPS	149 FPS
high	103 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	109 FPS
medium	75 FPS	91 FPS
high	64 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	61 FPS

Open Arc B570 Open Quadro GP100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	385 FPS	313 FPS
medium	323 FPS	274 FPS
high	239 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	212 FPS
medium	201 FPS	181 FPS
high	161 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	108 FPS
medium	98 FPS	91 FPS
high	80 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	59 FPS

Open Arc B570 Open Quadro GP100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	633 FPS	617 FPS
medium	506 FPS	494 FPS
high	422 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	316 FPS	308 FPS
1440p
low	475 FPS	463 FPS
medium	380 FPS	370 FPS
high	316 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	231 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	308 FPS
medium	253 FPS	247 FPS
high	211 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	154 FPS

Open Arc B570 Open Quadro GP100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
1080p
low	633 FPS	455 FPS
medium	506 FPS	417 FPS
high	422 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	316 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	475 FPS	365 FPS
medium	380 FPS	337 FPS
high	316 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	218 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	234 FPS
medium	253 FPS	218 FPS
high	211 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	146 FPS

Open Arc B570 Open Quadro GP100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Quadro GP100

Arc B570

The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Quadro GP100

The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1442 MHz.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
G3D Mark Score	14,060+3%	13,710
Architecture	Xe2	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3584+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.52 TFLOPS+11%	10.34 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2500 MHz+73%	1442 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	144	224+56%
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+246%	1.3 MB
L2 Cache	18 MB+350%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc B570 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 169.5% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 160-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	380 GB/s	1024 GB/s+169%
Bus Width	160-bit	4096-bit+2460%
L2 Cache	18 MB+350%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
Encoder	Intel Xe Media	NVENC 4th gen
Decoder	Intel Xe Media	NVDEC 3rd gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 44.2% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc B570	Quadro GP100
TDP	150W-36%	235W
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	249mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	93.7+61%	58.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The Arc B570 costs 96.9% less ($6781 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the Arc B570 offers 3110% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).