
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX Vega 64 holds the technical lead. Priced at $85 (vs $1,335), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1498% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1498%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) | ✅More affordable ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro GP100 and Radeon RX Vega 64

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.

Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,949+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+22% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1546 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+30% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 111.6% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+112% | 484 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+100% | 2048-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 22.6% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W-20% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3+23% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 MSRP and currently averages $1335, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 and now averages $85. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 93.6% less ($1250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro GP100) vs 164.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 1493.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $499-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1335 | $85-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 164.1+1493% |
| Codename | GP100 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #178 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















