Quadro GP100
Titan X Pascal
Quadro GP100 vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro GP100 vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro GP100 vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌483.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,801 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 481.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro GP100 vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710 | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1531 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224 | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal carries 8 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 113.3% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+113% | 480 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+967% | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W-6% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3+7% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro GP100 came in at $7000, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, Titan X Pascal was 82.9% cheaper ($5801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal offers 470% better value.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $1199-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 11.4+470% |
| Codename | GP100 | GP102 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #178 | #198 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and Titan X Pascal
