Quadro GP100
Radeon RX 6700M
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6700M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6700M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌74.1% higher power demand at 235W vs 135W.
Radeon RX 6700M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 235W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon RX 6700M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Radeon RX 6700M reaches 13,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710+1% | 13,525 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 2400 MHz+66% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+160% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro GP100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M carries 10 GB. Quadro GP100 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 220% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro GP100) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+60% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1024 GB/s+220% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+2460% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 54.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W | 135W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3 | 100.2+72% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700M (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | — |
| Codename | GP100 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #178 | #183 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and Radeon RX 6700M
