Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon RX 6700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon RX 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon RX 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 135W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅9.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌35% higher power demand at 135W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6600M instead at 13,922 vs 13,525, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6700M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon RX 6700M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6600M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon RX 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 6600M

The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6600M scores 13,922 and the Radeon RX 6700M reaches 13,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M).

Feature	Radeon RX 6600M	Radeon RX 6700M
G3D Mark Score	13,922+3%	13,525
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.659 TFLOPS	11.06 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock	2416 MHz	2400 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	144+29%
L1 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
Frame Generation	FSR 3 + AFMF	FSR 3 + AFMF
Ray Tracing Cores	28	36+29%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.

Feature	Radeon RX 6600M	Radeon RX 6700M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	FSR 3
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6600M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M carries 10 GB. Radeon RX 6700M gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 42.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600M and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the Radeon RX 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6600M	Radeon RX 6700M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	10 GB+25%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	320 GB/s+43%
Bus Width	128-bit	160-bit+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon RX 6600M	Radeon RX 6700M
DirectX	12 (FL 12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).

Feature	Radeon RX 6600M	Radeon RX 6700M
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6600M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 29.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.