Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 6600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 6600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 6600M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.

Radeon RX 6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro W5700 instead at 14,380 vs 13,922, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro W5700 has no comparable frame-generation support, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro W5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro W5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6600M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 6600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6600M

The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX 6600M reaches 13,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2416 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
G3D Mark Score	14,380+3%	13,922
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2304+29%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.893 TFLOPS+3%	8.659 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1930 MHz	2416 MHz+25%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144+29%	112
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
DirectX	12.0	12 (FL 12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 68.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
TDP	205W	100W-51%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	70.1	139.2+99%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 6600M (2021 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
MSRP	$799	—
Codename	Navi 10	Navi 23
Release	November 19 2019	May 31 2021
Ranking	#163	#173

Search Radeon Pro W5700 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.