Radeon Pro W5700
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌310% higher power demand at 205W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅28.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 205W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 14,909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2115 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,909+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 12.99 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2115 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (Ada) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (Ada) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 121.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 50W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 298.2+325% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD107 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #163 | #155 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
