G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 7600M XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 7600M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
142.9% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 44.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Radeon RX 7600M XT

2023

Why buy it

✅23.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 7600M XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (14,669 vs 14,380), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro W5700 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 7nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 7600M XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $470 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.7% (44.6 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 7600M XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7600M XT

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1280 MHz to 2469 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT reaches 14,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 20.23 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2469 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
G3D Mark Score	14,380	14,669+2%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	7 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.893 TFLOPS	20.23 TFLOPS+127%
Boost Clock	1930 MHz	2469 MHz+28%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144+13%	128
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7600M XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7600M XT. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
DirectX	12.0	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 7600M XT's 120W — a 52.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
TDP	205W	120W-41%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	85
Perf/Watt	70.1	122.2+74%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro W5700 came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7600M XT was 58.8% cheaper ($470 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 44.6 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon RX 7600M XT offers 147.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7600M XT (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP	$799	$329-59%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	44.6+148%
Codename	Navi 10	Navi 33
Release	November 19 2019	January 4 2023
Ranking	#163	#160

Search Radeon Pro W5700 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 7600M XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.