
Radeon Pro W5700

RTX A4000 Mobile
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX A4000 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX A4000 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX A4000 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌RTX A4000 Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌78.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 115W.
RTX A4000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅40.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 205W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5700 vs RTX A4000 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX A4000 Mobile reaches 14,782 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,782+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+93% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+15% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000 Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700 and 128-bit on the RTX A4000 Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 56.3% difference. The RTX A4000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 115W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 128.5+83% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A4000 Mobile (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA104 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #163 | #159 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















