Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600

AMD

Radeon Pro W5700

2019Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1930 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600

2021Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2903 MHz

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 23.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • 105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.

Radeon PRO W6600

2021

Why buy it

  • 27.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W6600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (14,932 vs 14,380), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $649 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.8% (23.0 vs 18.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600

The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon PRO W6600 reaches 14,932 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2903 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
G3D Mark Score
14,380
14,932+4%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
7 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2304+29%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.893 TFLOPS
10.4 TFLOPS+17%
Boost Clock
1930 MHz
2903 MHz+50%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+29%
112
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 3.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 68.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
TDP
205W
100W-51%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
190mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
70.1
149.3+113%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro W5700 came in at $799, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6600 was 18.8% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon PRO W6600 offers 27.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600 (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon Pro W5700Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP
$799
$649-19%
Performance per Dollar
18.0
23.0+28%
Codename
Navi 10
Navi 23
Release
November 19 2019
June 8 2021
Ranking
#163
#153

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.