Radeon RX 6650M vs Quadro RTX 5000
Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6650M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6650M and Quadro RTX 5000
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6650M scores 15,171 and the Quadro RTX 5000 reaches 15,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6650M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 384.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,171 | 15,443+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS | 11.15 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz+33% | 1815 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6650M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) — the Quadro RTX 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6650M draws 120W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 62.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6650M) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-48% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.4+88% | 67.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6650M | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $692 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | TU104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #148 | #143 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6650M and Quadro RTX 5000
