GeForce RTX 3070 vs Quadro RTX 5000
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 43.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+43.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-43.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $692 for the Quadro RTX 5000, it costs 71% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 396.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+396.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($692) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX 5000
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 15,443 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 43.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+44% | 15,443 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+92% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+82% | 11.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1815 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+93% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 48+4% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 384+109% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX 5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 4.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-4% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+50% | 67.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299 and now averages $692. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 71.1% less ($492 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 22.3 (Quadro RTX 5000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 397.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-78% | $2299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-71% | $692 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+397% | 22.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #63 | #143 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro RTX 5000
