
Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon RX 6700M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6700M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700M and GeForce RTX 2060

Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 240.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,525 | 14,114+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+20% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS+71% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+43% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+20% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.9 MB+280% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+20% | 30 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700M comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 66.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB+67% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 336 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 16.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 135W-16% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.2+14% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6700M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | TU106 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #183 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















