Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 6700M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 133.5% higher G3D Mark score and 20% more VRAM (12 GB vs 10 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6700M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-133.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+133.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 133.5%. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 60 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 240.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,525 | 31,578+133% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7680+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+262% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2610 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 7.5 MB+1400% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700M comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 57.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB | 12 GB+20% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 504 GB/s+57% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 71.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 135W-53% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.2 | 110.8+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | AD104 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #183 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6700M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
