Radeon RX 6700M vs Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 6700M
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 5600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 66.7% more VRAM (10 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5600 XT.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 and the Radeon RX 5600 XT reaches 13,453 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,525 | 13,453 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS+54% | 7.188 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+54% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5600 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700M comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 66.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 5% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 XT. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB+67% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 336 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 135W-10% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.2+12% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6700M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $279 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $180 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #183 | #187 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6700M and Radeon RX 5600 XT
