
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 100.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5600 XT.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+100.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-100.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 67% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 52.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon RX 5600 XT

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 13,453 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 100.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,919+100% | 13,453 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+156% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.15 TFLOPS+306% | 7.188 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2475 MHz+59% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5600 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+50% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+1100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 134.6+50% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279 and now averages $180. The Radeon RX 5600 XT costs 67.3% less ($370 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 74.7 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 52.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $279-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $180-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.9 | 74.7+53% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | April 12 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #32 | #187 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














