Radeon RX 6700M
Titan X Pascal
Radeon RX 6700M vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6700M vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6700M vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6700M
2021Why buy it
- ✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 250W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌85.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 135W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6700M vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6700M scores 13,525 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6700M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,525 | 13,660 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.06 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+57% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 224+56% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.3 MB+160% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Titan X Pascal does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 6700M gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 50% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700M and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB+25% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 480 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit+140% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6700M draws 135W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 59.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6700M) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 135W-46% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.2+84% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700M (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6700M | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1199 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GP102 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #183 | #198 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6700M and Titan X Pascal
