Radeon RX 6750 XT vs TITAN RTX
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN RTX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $1,203.96 for the TITAN RTX, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 287.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+287.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($320) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,203.96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 XT and TITAN RTX
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,686+3% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.31 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+47% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.5 MB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 72+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 55.6% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 672 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 11.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-11% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 82.7+15% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499 and now averages $1203.96. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 73.4% less ($884 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 16.7 (TITAN RTX) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 286.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-78% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-73% | $1203.96 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.6+287% | 16.7 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | TU102 |
| Release | March 3 2022 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #70 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6750 XT and TITAN RTX
