CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6850M
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6850M
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6850M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6850M and Arc A750
Radeon RX 6850M
The Radeon RX 6850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,274 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6850M scores 12,274 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6850M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 28 (Arc A750) vs 448.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,274 | 12,600+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3584+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A750) — a 18.5% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 512 GB/s+19% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6850M draws 120W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6850M) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6850M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-47% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 102.3+83% | 56.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6850M and Arc A750
