
Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 143.8% higher G3D Mark score and 150% more VRAM (20 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+143.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-143.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (20 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (276mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $630 for the Radeon RX 7900 XT, it costs 76% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 72.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+72.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($630) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7900 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7900 XT scores 28,996 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the Radeon RX 7900 XT leads by 143.8%. The Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2394 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,996+144% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5376+110% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 51.48 TFLOPS+473% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2394 MHz+36% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+500% | 32 |
| TMUs | 336+320% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+320% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7900 XT comes with 20 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 XT offers 150% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 257.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Radeon RX 7900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 20 GB+150% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 800 GB/s+257% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7900 XT draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 276mm vs 235mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 130W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 276mm | 235mm |
| Height | 110mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.7+6% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $630, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 76.2% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 72.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $249-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $630 | $150-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.0 | 79.3+72% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA106 |
| Release | November 3 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #21 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














