
Radeon RX 9060

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Radeon RX 9060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 9060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 9060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 9060
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 27.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌88.6% higher power demand at 132W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅11.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 132W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Radeon RX 9060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌151% HIGHER MSRP$625 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.4 vs 68.8 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 9060 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 9060
The Radeon RX 9060 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 5 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2990 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,121 points.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 9060 scores 17,121 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation reaches 17,147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 9060 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 9060) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 21.43 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2990 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 9060) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 88.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,121 | 17,147 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2816+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.43 TFLOPS+79% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2990 MHz+40% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+27% | 22 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 9060 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 9060 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 9060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000 Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — a 12.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 9060. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon RX 9060 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 9060) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 9060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 9060 draws 132W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 61.4% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 9060) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 70W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7 | 245.0+89% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 9060 came in at $249, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625. On MSRP, Radeon RX 9060 was 60.2% cheaper ($376 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 68.8 (Radeon RX 9060) vs 27.4 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 9060 offers 151.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 9060 (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9060 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-60% | $625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.8+151% | 27.4 |
| Codename | Navi 44 | AD107 |
| Release | August 5 2025 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #111 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














