Radeon RX Vega 5 vs GeForce GT 1030

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega 5 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 5 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 1030 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 1030 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 5.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	Vega (2017−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 1030 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega 5 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 1030 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 5 and GeForce GT 1030

Radeon RX Vega 5

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 1400 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,356 points.

GeForce GT 1030

The GeForce GT 1030 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,407 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 5 scores 2,356 and the GeForce GT 1030 reaches 2,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 5 is built on Vega while the GeForce GT 1030 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 384 (GeForce GT 1030). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
G3D Mark Score	2,356	2,407+2%
Architecture	Vega	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	320	384+20%
Boost Clock	1400 MHz	1468 MHz+5%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega 5 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 1030 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 1030 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 12 (GeForce GT 1030). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs None (GeForce GT 1030). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GT 1030).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
Encoder	VCN 2.0	None
Decoder	VCN 2.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 5 draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 1030's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 5 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 300W (GeForce GT 1030). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 5	GeForce GT 1030
TDP	15W-50%	30W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	145mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	157.1+96%	80.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega 5 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GT 1030 launched at $79 and now averages $95. The Radeon RX Vega 5 costs 100+% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 25.3 (GeForce GT 1030) — the Radeon RX Vega 5 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 5 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).