
Radeon RX Vega 5 vs GeForce MX250

Radeon RX Vega 5
Popular choices:

GeForce MX250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 5.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | Vega (2017−2020) (7nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX250 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 5 and GeForce MX250

Radeon RX Vega 5
The Radeon RX Vega 5 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2020. It features the Vega architecture. The boost clock speed is 1400 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,356 points.

GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 5 scores 2,356 and the GeForce MX250 reaches 2,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 5 is built on Vega while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 320 (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,356 | 2,375 |
| Architecture | Vega | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 384+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+35% | 1038 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 5 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX250 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX250 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 5 draws 15W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 10W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 157.1 | 237.5+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 5 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX Vega 5 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 5) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon RX Vega 5 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 5 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 5 | GeForce MX250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 15.8 |
| Codename | Vega | GP108B |
| Release | January 7 2020 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #716 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















