
Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Quadro P5000

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX Vega 56 holds the technical lead. Priced at $75 (vs $400), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 445.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+445.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 56 and Quadro P5000

Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 13,026 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1471 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,026+2% | 12,728 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.54 TFLOPS+19% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1471 MHz | 1733 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 960 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 56 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 42.4% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 410 GB/s+42% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+700% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 15.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W | 180W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 70.7+14% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $400. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 81.3% less ($325 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.7 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 31.8 (Quadro P5000) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 446.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-81% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.7+446% | 31.8 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP104 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #199 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















