
Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX Vega 56 holds the technical lead. Priced at $75 (vs $114), it costs 34% less, resulting in a 53.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($75) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 56 and Radeon Pro Vega 64

Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 56 scores 13,026 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1471 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,026+1% | 12,891 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.54 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1471 MHz+9% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 56 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+1500% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-16% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 280mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0+20% | 51.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 and now averages $114. The Radeon RX Vega 56 costs 34.2% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 173.7 (Radeon RX Vega 56) vs 113.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 offers 53.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75-34% | $114 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.7+54% | 113.1 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #199 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















